2024/10/23
Medical Collective Intelligence Co., Ltd. (https://www.medical-ci.co.jp/), a healthcare market research firm based in Tokyo, carried out a study on brand promotion in ophthalmology. Analysis was conducted using 500 valid responses, a robust sample size especially for research targeting ophthalmologists.
The outcome revealed that face-to-face channels performed better in the promotion targeting ophthalmologists. Among the online channels, “Online seminars (webinars)” came on top, and it also ranked second as the source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future after “Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings).
・ Alesion Eyelid Cream had the highest percentage of ophthalmologists that received detailing or collected information on the product in the past 3 months. Eylea 8 mg came in second followed by Vabysmo.
・ Eylea 8 mg came in first among hospital ophthalmologists, and Alesion Eyelid Cream came on top among clinic ophthalmologists.
・ The percentage of ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription was about 60% for Alesion Eyelid Cream and about 40% for Eylea 8 mg and Vabysmo.
■Percentage of ophthalmologists who either received detailing or collected information on in the past 3 months
*Excerpt of the top 3 products among all ophthalmologists
|
All |
Hospital |
Clinic |
Alesion Eyelid Cream |
77% |
73% |
82% |
Eylea 8 mg |
72% |
82% |
60% |
Vabysmo |
54% |
65% |
41% |
※Hospital/Clinic cutoff at 20 beds
■Percentage of ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription
|
All |
Hospital |
Clinic |
Alesion Eyelid Cream |
56% |
51% |
61% |
Eylea 8 mg |
40% |
44% |
34% |
Vabysmo |
42% |
46% |
35% |
*Percentage among ophthalmologists who either received detailing or collected information on each product
・ As the source of information that had a positive impact on prescription, "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) came on top for all three products (70 to 80%), followed by "Product explanation sessions" (approximately 20%).
・ "Seminars at a venue" and "Online seminars (webinars)" were also common for Eylea 8 mg and Vabysmo (12% to 15%)
・ Face-to-face channels performed better in the promotion targeting ophthalmologists*1.
■Source of information that triggered prescription (select all that apply)
|
Alesion |
Eylea 8 mg |
Vabysmo |
Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) |
77% |
74% |
76% |
Explanation from the sales representative (online meetings or phone calls) |
3% |
9% |
7% |
Explanation from the sales representative (e-mails) |
3% |
3% |
4% |
Product explanation sessions |
17% |
21% |
15% |
Seminars at a venue |
1% |
15% |
14% |
Online seminars (webinars) |
7% |
12% |
15% |
Websites of pharmaceutical companies |
3% |
3% |
2% |
Online medical portals |
6% |
8% |
7% |
Information provision from pharmaceutical companies at congresses |
1% |
3% |
3% |
Information provision from pharmaceutical companies in medical journals |
3% |
1% |
3% |
Other |
0% |
1% |
0% |
*Percentage among ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription for each product
*Blue cells: Top channel
*Orange cells: 10% or higher
(*1) A separate study that targeted doctors of all specialty implied that the percentage of doctors for whom "Sales representative (meetings or phone calls)" was a source of information that was impactful to prescription was approximately 50%.
(Outcome from "Multimedia White Paper on Physicians - 2024 Fall" hosted by MCI)
・ "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings)" ranked first as the source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future, followed by "Online seminars (webinars)."
・ "Seminars at a venue" ranked first among hospital ophthalmologists, and "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) ranked first among clinic ophthalmologists.
■Source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future (select all that apply)
|
All |
Hospital |
Clinic |
Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) |
27% |
22% |
33% |
Explanation from the sales representative (online meetings or phone calls) |
6% |
7% |
5% |
Explanation from the sales representative (e-mails) |
10% |
9% |
11% |
Product explanation session |
23% |
26% |
20% |
Seminars at a venue |
23% |
26% |
19% |
Online seminars (webinars) |
25% |
25% |
25% |
Websites of pharmaceutical companies |
11% |
11% |
12% |
Online medical portals |
18% |
17% |
19% |
Information provision from pharmaceutical companies at congresses |
19% |
20% |
16% |
Information provision from pharmaceutical companies in medical journals |
16% |
16% |
16% |
Other |
3% |
3% |
3% |
None of the above |
42% |
43% |
41% |
*Blue cells: Top channel
*Green cells: 20% or higher
■Appendix - Products that ophthalmologists received detailing or collected information on in the past 3 months
*Excerpt of the top 15 products among all ophthalmologists
|
All |
Hospital |
Clinic |
|
1 |
Alesion Eyelid Cream |
77% |
73% |
82% |
2 |
Eylea 8 mg |
72% |
82% |
60% |
3 |
Vabysmo |
54% |
65% |
41% |
4 |
GLA-alpha |
49% |
49% |
50% |
5 |
Diquas / Diquas LX |
46% |
38% |
56% |
6 |
Azimycin |
33% |
26% |
42% |
7 |
Ranibizumab BS |
29% |
34% |
23% |
8 |
Glanatec |
29% |
30% |
28% |
9 |
Beovu |
29% |
34% |
22% |
10 |
Mikeluna |
28% |
22% |
36% |
11 |
Eybelis |
27% |
21% |
35% |
12 |
Ailamide |
27% |
23% |
32% |
13 |
Aibeta |
23% |
20% |
28% |
14 |
Alesion / Alesion LX Ophthalmic Solution |
23% |
19% |
29% |
15 |
Aiphagan |
22% |
20% |
24% |
■Research Outline
Target audience |
Ophthalmologists |
Valid sample size |
500 samples (280 hospital ophthalmologists, 220 clinic ophthalmologists) |
Methodology |
Online survey |
Fieldwork |
September 17 to September 30, 2024 |
Key topics |
・ Sources of information on ophthalmic drugs, sources of information to utilize more/less in the future |
If you have any questions, please contact…