イメージ

ニュース & トピックス

アイコン

2024/10/23

Marketing Research

Survey on Brand Promotion - Outcome Among 500 Ophthalmologists
“Face-to-face channels excel in promotion targeting ophthalmologists”



Medical Collective Intelligence Co., Ltd. (https://www.medical-ci.co.jp/), a healthcare market research firm based in Tokyo, carried out a study on brand promotion in ophthalmology. Analysis was conducted using 500 valid responses, a robust sample size especially for research targeting ophthalmologists.

The outcome revealed that face-to-face channels performed better in the promotion targeting ophthalmologists. Among the online channels, “Online seminars (webinars)” came on top, and it also ranked second as the source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future after “Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings).



Outcome

The products ophthalmologists gained information on most frequently was "Eylea 8 mg" among hospital ophthalmologists and "Alesion Eyelid Cream" among clinic ophthalmologists.
The top 3 products that ophthalmologists most frequently gained information on all had over 40% of the ophthalmologists indicating that the information they learned had a positive impact on prescription.

 ・ Alesion Eyelid Cream had the highest percentage of ophthalmologists that received detailing or collected information on the product in the past 3 months. Eylea 8 mg came in second followed by Vabysmo.
 ・ Eylea 8 mg came in first among hospital ophthalmologists, and Alesion Eyelid Cream came on top among clinic ophthalmologists.
 ・ The percentage of ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription was about 60% for Alesion Eyelid Cream and about 40% for Eylea 8 mg and Vabysmo.

■Percentage of ophthalmologists who either received detailing or collected information on in the past 3 months
*Excerpt of the top 3 products among all ophthalmologists

 

All
(n=500)

Hospital
(n=280)

Clinic
(n=220)

Alesion Eyelid Cream

77%

73%

82%

Eylea 8 mg

72%

82%

60%

Vabysmo

54%

65%

41%

※Hospital/Clinic cutoff at 20 beds

■Percentage of ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription

 

All

Hospital

Clinic

Alesion Eyelid Cream

56%

51%

61%

Eylea 8 mg

40%

44%

34%

Vabysmo

42%

46%

35%

*Percentage among ophthalmologists who either received detailing or collected information on each product



Face-to-face channels performed better in the promotion targeting ophthalmologists

 ・ As the source of information that had a positive impact on prescription, "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) came on top for all three products (70 to 80%), followed by "Product explanation sessions" (approximately 20%).
 ・ "Seminars at a venue" and "Online seminars (webinars)" were also common for Eylea 8 mg and Vabysmo (12% to 15%)
 ・ Face-to-face channels performed better in the promotion targeting ophthalmologists*1.

■Source of information that triggered prescription (select all that apply)

 

Alesion
Eyelid Cream
(n=184)

Eylea 8 mg
(n=146)

Vabysmo
(n=115)

Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings)

77%

74%

76%

Explanation from the sales representative (online meetings or phone calls)

3%

9%

7%

Explanation from the sales representative (e-mails)

3%

3%

4%

Product explanation sessions

17%

21%

15%

Seminars at a venue

1%

15%

14%

Online seminars (webinars)

7%

12%

15%

Websites of pharmaceutical companies

3%

3%

2%

Online medical portals

6%

8%

7%

Information provision from pharmaceutical companies at congresses

1%

3%

3%

Information provision from pharmaceutical companies in medical journals

3%

1%

3%

Other

0%

1%

0%

*Percentage among ophthalmologists who indicated that the information had a positive impact on prescription for each product
*Blue cells: Top channel
*Orange cells: 10% or higher

(*1) A separate study that targeted doctors of all specialty implied that the percentage of doctors for whom "Sales representative (meetings or phone calls)" was a source of information that was impactful to prescription was approximately 50%.
(Outcome from "Multimedia White Paper on Physicians - 2024 Fall" hosted by MCI)



Top channels that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future were "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings)", and "Online seminars (webinars)."

 ・ "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings)" ranked first as the source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future, followed by "Online seminars (webinars)."
 ・ "Seminars at a venue" ranked first among hospital ophthalmologists, and "Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings) ranked first among clinic ophthalmologists.

■Source of information that ophthalmologists want to utilize more in the future (select all that apply)

 

All
(n=500)

Hospital
(n=280)

Clinic
(n=220)

Explanation from the sales representative (face-to-face meetings)

27%

22%

33%

Explanation from the sales representative (online meetings or phone calls)

6%

7%

5%

Explanation from the sales representative (e-mails)

10%

9%

11%

Product explanation session

23%

26%

20%

Seminars at a venue

23%

26%

19%

Online seminars (webinars)

25%

25%

25%

Websites of pharmaceutical companies

11%

11%

12%

Online medical portals

18%

17%

19%

Information provision from pharmaceutical companies at congresses

19%

20%

16%

Information provision from pharmaceutical companies in medical journals

16%

16%

16%

Other

3%

3%

3%

None of the above

42%

43%

41%

*Blue cells: Top channel
*Green cells: 20% or higher

■Appendix - Products that ophthalmologists received detailing or collected information on in the past 3 months
*Excerpt of the top 15 products among all ophthalmologists

 

All
(n=500)

Hospital
(n=280)

Clinic
(n=220)

1

Alesion Eyelid Cream

77%

73%

82%

2

Eylea 8 mg

72%

82%

60%

3

Vabysmo

54%

65%

41%

4

GLA-alpha

49%

49%

50%

5

Diquas / Diquas LX

46%

38%

56%

6

Azimycin

33%

26%

42%

7

Ranibizumab BS

29%

34%

23%

8

Glanatec

29%

30%

28%

9

Beovu

29%

34%

22%

10

Mikeluna

28%

22%

36%

11

Eybelis

27%

21%

35%

12

Ailamide

27%

23%

32%

13

Aibeta

23%

20%

28%

14

Alesion / Alesion LX Ophthalmic Solution

23%

19%

29%

15

Aiphagan

22%

20%

24%

 

■Research Outline

Target audience

Ophthalmologists

Valid sample size

500 samples (280 hospital ophthalmologists, 220 clinic ophthalmologists)
*Hospital/Clinic cutoff at 20 beds

Methodology

Online survey

Fieldwork

September 17 to September 30, 2024

Key topics

・ Sources of information on ophthalmic drugs, sources of information to utilize more/less in the future
・ Drugs ophthalmologists received detailing or collected information on in the past 3 months
     > Recalled messages on each product (open ended responses)
     > Sources of information
     > Whether the information had a positive impact on prescription
・ Ophthalmic drugs in the pipeline that seem promising
・ Names of doctors/institutions ophthalmologists refer to when making treatment decisions for retinal diseases, glaucoma, and ocular hypertension
・ Other

 

If you have any questions, please contact…
Shin Saiki
Healthcare Partner Division
Medical Collective Intelligence Co., Ltd.
[email protected]